• Member Login
  • |
  • Join Now
PESA - Energy Geoscience

Promoting Professional and Technical Excellence in Energy Geoscience – Networking, On-going Professional Education, Monthly Technical Meetings

  • Home
  • About
    • About PESA
    • Objectives
    • PESA History
    • PESA Affiliates
    • Constitution and Rules
    • Strategic Plan
  • Events
    • Online
    • NSW / ACT
    • QLD
    • SA / NT
    • VIC / TAS
    • WA
    • Industry
    • Social
    • Past Events
  • Membership
    • Join Us
    • APPEA Conference Discounts
    • AEGC 2025 Travel Bursaries
    • PESA Membership Awards
  • Latest News
    • All News
    • Feature Articles
    • Industry
    • Company Updates
    • Tech Talk (public)
    • PESA Branch Activities
  • Library
    • Technical Library
    • PESA Gazette
    • Webinars
    • PESA News Magazine
    • Knowledgette Recordings
  • Scholarships
  • Employment
    • View Job Opportunities
    • Submit Job
  • Contact

A minimum-strain approach to reducing the structural uncertainty in poor 2D seismic data, Gambier Embayment, Otway Basin, Australia

08/11/2021 by Thomas Brand

A minimum-strain approach to reducing the structural uncertainty in poor 2D seismic data, Gambier Embayment, Otway Basin, Australia

 

Download Section

Please log in to download this file.

Alternatively, you can search for this item and individually purchase it from the PESA collection at AAPG DataPages

PESA collection at AAPG DataPages

Publication Name: Eastern Australian Basins Symposium III (EABS 2008)

Authors: P. Boult, B. Freeman, G. Yielding, S. Menpes and L.J. Diekman

Date Published: September 2008

Number of Pages: 10

Abstract:

In faulted reservoirs, structural uncertainty arises from two major sources of error; the systematic error of the seismic method and the human error of the interpreter. When the magnitude of fault displacements is greater than the distance between samples, providing seismic data quality is good, the pattern of faulting is usually clear and may be largely unequivocal. This means the order of error in lateral positioning of structures is approximately the same as the error in the vertical dimension and both are dominantly systematic. This is typical of good quality 3D seismic data. For 2D seismic data, poor quality 3D data and for small faults in 3D data, the pattern of faulting becomes much more of an interpretive issue since fault offsets are small compared with the distances between samples. The balance of the error, or uncertainty, is then strongly one-sided and the effects of systematic errors become secondary to those inherent in the interpreter’s ‘model’.

Tags: EABS

PESA - Energy Geoscience

PESA Energy Geoscience is a non-profit association of individuals involved in the exploration of oil and gas.

Connect with us

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay on the loop of what is happening in the field of Energy Geoscience and events near you.

pesa newsletter
* indicates required

PESA Energy Geoscience will use the information you provide on this form to be in touch with you and to provide updates and marketing. Please confirm you give us permission to contact you via your email address:

You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us. We will treat your information with respect. For more information about our privacy practices please visit our website. By clicking below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

Copyright © 2025 PESA - Energy Geoscience. All Rights Reserved.

  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Policies
  • Privacy
  • Terms & Conditions